Given the recent decision of the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) to
spend more time considering the implementation of private copying and parody copyright exceptions statutory instruments, I've written to the Chairman of the Committee,
George Mudie. Copy of my note below.
Dear Mr Mudie,
As Chairman of the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments
(JCSI), I’m writing to you in relation to your committee’s recent consideration
of the proposed five copyright exceptions statutory instruments (SIs). I note
the Committee has concluded its consideration of three of the five but has some
questions about the private copying and parody exceptions.
An Oxford University economist of international renown, Mark
was a passionate advocate for evidence based policy making in the intellectual
property arena. Down to earth family man, friend, academic and practical
economist, optimist, writer, basketball coach and player, runner, cyclist, all
round handyman and an infinite well of sound personal and professional advice,
Mark was one of those impossibly nice, exceptionally talented and generous
individuals you’d like your children to emulate. The dignity and positive
outlook with which he faced his illness were genuinely awe inspiring. The
simple fact that someone of Mark’s ilk devoted considerable energy, over many
years, to the importance of evidence based intellectual property policy making
speaks for itself. What he had to say about copyright exceptions should
be of particular interest to the JCSI.
In relation to JCSI’s recent deliberations, our Consumer
Focus report focused solely on copyright exceptions as they relate to
non-commercial, consumer activities. It dealt specifically with private copy
format shifting and parody. We concluded -
Investigating potential economic damage to rights-holders requires an analysis
of how consumer copyright exception could affect the demand for the original
creative work. The processes via which consumer copyright exceptions influence
the demand curve for original creative work can be complicated. This said, a
standard analysis of the demand for creative works must assume that consumers
incorporate the benefit of copyright exceptions into their demand. A consumer’s
decision to purchase is based on the benefits of the product, including – in
the case of creative work – the value of any copyright exception. In this
sense, it can be argued that a creator automatically extracts value from
copyright exceptions, since these directly influence the demand for the
original creative work.
The economic evidence that format-shifting, parody and user-generated content
cause any kind of economic damage to rights-holders simply does not exist.
Arguments that support tighter copyright law, or support Private Copying
Remuneration (PCR) systems, tend to confuse economic damage with consumer
value. Any future analysis on this issue needs to investigate the conditions
under which the proposed consumer copyright exceptions would have any impact on
demand for creative work.
I hope that you and the JCSI find the report helpful. If you have any questions
or I can provide any further input to the Committee’s deliberations on
copyright exceptions do let me know.
Yours sincerely,
Ray Corrigan
Ray Corrigan, Senior Lecturer in Maths, Computing
and Technology, Open University;
No comments:
Post a Comment