B2fxxx

By Ray Corrigan
 


RSS Feed

Atom Site Feed




A version of my old Open University net law course, T182 Law, the Internet and Society, is now available on OpenLearn.

Arabic German Portuguese Chinese Italian Russian Japanese Spanish French Korean (About)




Aaron Swartz
Abusable tech ATAC
Academic Copyright
AdviceNow UK Advice service
A copyfighter's musings
Alex Salkever's Security Net
American Prospect
Andrew McLaughlin
Ariadne
Atlantic Monthly
Ananova
ARCH
ALA Info-Commons blog
Bag and baggage
BALII
Balkanization
Battle Searchblog
BBC
Berkeley IP Blawg
Berkman Center
beSpacific
Bhopal Justice Campaign
Bitlaw
Blawg Republic
Blogbook
Blogs at Harvard
Blogscript
Blogzilla Ian Brown
BNA net news
BNA Web Watch
Boingboing
Censorware Project
CDT
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
Chronicle of Higher Education
CIA Factbook
City of Sound
Cluebot
CNN
CNet News
Consensus at Lawerpoint
Copyfight
Copyfutures
Copyright Colloquium
Copyright Readings blog
Cornell's LII
Corner House
Creative Commons
Criminal waste of space
Crypto-gram
Current bytes in brief
CyberRights UK
Cyberspace law
Daily Whirl
Dan Gillmor
Darknet J.D. Lasica
David Isenberg
disLEXia
Doc Searls
Don't link to us
Drew Clark
Economics of Privacy
Economist
Ed Techie
EDDix top 50 blawgs
E-evidence
EFF
EFF Deeplinks
EFF Minilinks
Elizabeth Rader
EPIC
Ernie the Attorney
Electronic Telegraph
Equal vote blog
Ethical Spectacle
EU Law Web Log
EUpolitix
Euractiv news
EUR Lex index
http://Euro-Copyrights.org/
Europa
EU Commission Pressroom
Europemedia
Evoting-experts.com/
Feedmelegal
footnotes
Fravia web searchlore
Freedom to Tinker
First Monday
Financial Times
Findlaw
FIPR
Froomkin
Froomkin blog
Furdlog - Frank Field
Gigalaw
GILC
Global Voices
GovNet newsfeed
Greplaw
Groklaw
Harvard Jolt
How Appealing
Ian Clarke's blog
ICANN Watch
Ideal e-government
ID theft protection blog
Importance of
INDICARE on drm
INDUCE Act blog
Infolaw
Inforlaw What's New blog
Infosoctech Alan Cunningham
Instapundit
International Herald Tribune
Internet censorship explorer
Internet Legal Resource Grp
Internet Scambusters
IP Central weblog
IPKat
IP Matters
IPRsonline portal
IP Watch
ITN
James Boyle
Jennifer Granick
Jessica Litman
JILT
Jurist
Jurist Paper Chase
Justice Talking
Kim Cameron's Identity blog
Kuro5hin
Law.com
Lawmeme at Yale
Law Society Gazette
Legal Affairs
Legal Theory (Solum) Blog
Lessig weblog
Lex Ferenda
Lex in the city iNews
Librarians' Internet Index
LibraryLaw blog
Linux Journal
Madisonian Theory
Martin W
Mercury News
Memex
Mindjack
MIT Technology Review
MSNBC
Napsterization
Newsforge
No2ID
Nolo Law Center
The Ndiyo Project
New York Times
NTK
Ofcomwatch
OneWorld
Online Journalism Review
On Lisa's Radar
Once upon a time...
On the Commons - Bollier
On the Identity Trail
Open Access News
Open Rights Group
O'Reilly
OUseful
Overlawyered UK
Pangloss Lilian Edwards
P2P policy course Berkeley
Policy Power Tools
Politech
PLoS
Posner & Becker Blog
Privacy & economics
Privacy Journal
Privacy Policy
Walt Mossberg
Phil Agre
Public Knowledge
Quicklinks
Reason
Red Herring
Reporting Civil Rights
RIP archive at FIPR
Roger Clarke
Ross Anderson
Rufus Pollock
Salon
Samuelson's cyberlinks
SANS Computer Security
Sarah Carter's lawlinks
ScadPlus Activities of the EU
SCOTUS blog
Scripting News
Shifted Librarian
Shirky
Siva Vaidhyanathan
Siva Vaidhyanathan Googlization
TalkLeft
Village Voice
Volokh Conspiracy
SciDev Network
Security Focus
Seltzer blog
Seth Finkelstein
Shifted Librarian
Silicon Valley
Slashdot
Slate
Snopes Urban legends
Spyblog
Stephen Fry
STLR
Susan Crawford
American Prospect Weblog
Tech Law Journal
The CATO Institute
The Blog of Doom
The Corner House
The Green Bag
The Guardian
The Industry Standard
The Laboratorium James Grimmelmann
The Nando Times
The New Republic TNR
The Register
The Times
The RISKS Digest
The Trademark Blog
Tony H
Townhall
UCLA Cyberspace Law
UEA law blog
UK Court Service
UK Criminal Justice blog
UK FOI blog
UK Human Rights Archive
UNESCO copyright site
Urban Legends
USACM blog
VUNet
Weatherall's law
Wikipedia
WIPO
WIPO CLEA
WJIN
xkcd
ZDNet

http://www.wikio.co.uk


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Sitemeter count:

One click on a button helps feed the hungry

Support the Open Rights Group

Search
Google

WWW
B2fxxx


Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter



          Saturday, November 13, 2010

     
    Politicians like simple stories and simple solutions even when the issues are complex as with net neutrality.  I get it.  So they get told simple stories by lobbyists to get them to behave in a way that is beneficial to certain commercial interests. I get that. Complaints that the debates on net neutrality are dominated by extremes are legitimate.  But the logical leap then to the argument that net neutrality purists should be dismissed and commercial interests prevail - i.e. saying one end of the spectrum is right and the other wrong - is a leap too far.

    Jean-Jacques Sahels of Skype and La Quadrature du net's Jérémie Zimmermann, for example, were very badly treated by the first afternoon session chair, Malcolm Harbour, who insisted in intervening in their contributions to the debate and disagreeing with them. At the same time Mr Harbour both explicitly and implicitly praised the contributions of those selling the anti net neutrality message. Mr Harbour's duty as an MEP is to look to the public interest and undermining those who are attempting to speaking up for the public interest should not be part of his remit.

    Cisco and similar tech companies want to sell intelligent network kit.That's their business.  The more intelligent the kit the better the margins. Net neutrality doesn't aid their bottom line.  They have a right to argue for the need for "innovation at the core of the network" but it doesn't negate the fact that it is the innovation at the edges of the network that has transformed the world.

    Telcos sell access to networks.  Controlling how people behave on those networks is in their interests particularly when they can charge more to provide access to the faster, broader, low latency services.  Net neutrality doesn't serve that end.  Of course if they are seen to be able to control traffic then their get out clause on liability for third party behaviour on their networks may be forfeited but that may be a balancing act they have to manage.

    Similarly net neutrality gives mobile operators revenue issues.

    Unfortunately when the pie is sliced up amongst the stakeholders:

    Commercial users of the Net (content owners, retailers, search engines, cloud providers etc.)
    Commercial facilitators of the Net (telcos, Ciscos etc.)
    Ordinary nay extraordinary net users (general public)

    The interests of the general public rarely come into the decision making other than in vague promises about keeping the public at the heart of the debate or platitudes on transparency or consumer empowerment. When there are vague commitments to the 'bests efforts internet' in addition to 'managed services' there is little doubt that the 'bests efforts internet' ultimately means the slow lane for people who are not prepared to or don't have the wherewithal to pay the necessary premium for the managed services.

    Just one extra point about managed services.  So often one of the big excuses for saying we'll need special fast lanes is that it will be necessary for elearning.  As someone who has been deeply buried in the practice of so-called elearning at scale for over 15 years the best thing the Commission and Parliament could do for elearning is to gaurantee a universal superfast network infrastructure and make it open.  The thing that most interferes with elearning is congestion and poor quality of service at the ends of the network.  The thing that will fix that is big fat low latency dumb and neutral communications pipes.  How you cut the gordian knot on investment in and construction of such an infrastructure is a tough one. But that's what policymakers should be focussing on not on protecting existing commercial interests.  And maybe they need to be reading up on John Maynard Keynes and thinking about public and private investment in such an infrastructure.  Pay some people to dig holes, pay more people to fill them with fibre optic cables, pay more people to fill them in and pay even more to connect every home in Europe to the fastest open infrastructure in the world.  Connect all those people, spin the continent and watch the magic flow.

    Bookmark and Share