Pages

Monday, May 17, 2004

Groklaw is reporting that Germany are going to vote against the EU's software directive, which the Irish presidency has been trying to slip through.

FFII say:

NB. See FFII breaking news wiki for very latest information, at
http://kwiki.ffii.org/SwpatcninoEn


It looks as though there's a chance things may be moving in our favour.


The agenda for the Competitiveness Council meeting has been published,
with a full discussion now scheduled on the Software Patents directive;
furthermore the discussion is to be in public, ie with press and
visitors able to listen in with 11-way translation.
http://ue.eu.int/cms3_applications/Applications/newsRoom/loadbook.asp?BID=880&LANG=1&cmsId=364

We don't yet know whether there's any chance of it being webcast.


This a big step forward from the official EU media briefing, published
only on Friday morning, which said the directive was due to be
rubberstamped as an 'A-item' without discussion.
http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guestfr.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=MEMO/04/114%7C0%7CRAPID&lg=EN&display=


The EU media briefing also tries very hard to play the play up the Irish
draft as a 'compromise' position.

But it's clear from this report from Paul Meller that by the time of the
press conference this afternoon journalists were obviously well enough
briefed that the EU spokesman had to confirm everything we'd said:
http://www.itworld.com/Man/2687/040514eupatents/


The national positions won't finally be clear until we hear what
actually gets said on Tuesday, but there are signs that there may be an
increasing number of ministers with concerns about the text, and a very
real possibility that a number of countries may seek a delay to give time to

* achieve more unity;
* investigate further the concerns about
- freedom of discussion
- interoperability
- scope of what is and what is not 'technical';
* produce a text more likely to pass the European Parliament.


On the other hand, as best we know, the UK and Ireland are still pushing
all-out for the Presidency text.




No comments:

Post a Comment