The Open University Relevant Knowledge programme is here.

B2fxxx

By Ray Corrigan
 


RSS Feed

Atom Site Feed




Arabic German Portuguese Chinese Italian Russian Japanese Spanish French Korean (About)


Aaron Swartz
Abusable tech ATAC
Academic Copyright
AdviceNow UK Advice service
A copyfighter's musings
Alex Salkever's Security Net
American Prospect
Andrew McLaughlin
Ariadne
Atlantic Monthly
Ananova
ARCH
ALA Info-Commons blog
Bag and baggage
BALII
Balkanization
Battle Searchblog
BBC
Berkeley IP Blawg
Berkman Center
beSpacific
Bhopal Justice Campaign
Bitlaw
Blawg Republic
Blogbook
Blogs at Harvard
Blogscript
Blogzilla Ian Brown
BNA net news
BNA Web Watch
Boingboing
Censorware Project
CDT
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
Chronicle of Higher Education
CIA Factbook
City of Sound
Cluebot
CNN
CNet News
Consensus at Lawerpoint
Copyfight
Copyfutures
Copyright Colloquium
Copyright Readings blog
Cornell's LII
Corner House
Creative Commons
Criminal waste of space
Crypto-gram
Current bytes in brief
CyberRights UK
Cyberspace law
Daily Whirl
Dan Gillmor
Darknet J.D. Lasica
David Isenberg
disLEXia
Doc Searls
Don't link to us
Drew Clark
Economics of Privacy
Economist
Ed Techie
EDDix top 50 blawgs
E-evidence
EFF
EFF Deeplinks
EFF Minilinks
Elizabeth Rader
EPIC
Ernie the Attorney
Electronic Telegraph
Equal vote blog
Ethical Spectacle
EU Law Web Log
EUpolitix
Euractiv news
EUR Lex index
http://Euro-Copyrights.org/
Europa
EU Commission Pressroom
Europemedia
Evoting-experts.com/
Feedmelegal
footnotes
Fravia web searchlore
Freedom to Tinker
First Monday
Financial Times
Findlaw
FIPR
Froomkin
Froomkin blog
Furdlog - Frank Field
Gigalaw
GILC
Global Voices
GovNet newsfeed
Greplaw
Groklaw
Harvard Jolt
How Appealing
Ian Clarke's blog
ICANN Watch
Ideal e-government
ID theft protection blog
Importance of
INDICARE on drm
INDUCE Act blog
Infolaw
Inforlaw What's New blog
Infosoctech Alan Cunningham
Instapundit
International Herald Tribune
Internet censorship explorer
Internet Legal Resource Grp
Internet Scambusters
IP Central weblog
IPKat
IP Matters
IPRsonline portal
IP Watch
ITN
James Boyle
Jennifer Granick
Jessica Litman
JILT
Jurist
Jurist Paper Chase
Justice Talking
Kim Cameron's Identity blog
Kuro5hin
Law.com
Lawmeme at Yale
Law Society Gazette
Legal Affairs
Legal Theory (Solum) Blog
Lessig weblog
Lex Ferenda
Lex in the city iNews
Librarians' Internet Index
LibraryLaw blog
Linux Journal
Madisonian Theory
Martin W
Mercury News
Memex
Mindjack
MIT Technology Review
MSNBC
Napsterization
Newsforge
No2ID
Nolo Law Center
The Ndiyo Project
New York Times
NTK
Ofcomwatch
OneWorld
Online Journalism Review
On Lisa's Radar
Once upon a time...
On the Commons - Bollier
On the Identity Trail
Open Access News
Open Rights Group
O'Reilly
OUseful
Overlawyered UK
Pangloss Lilian Edwards
P2P policy course Berkeley
Policy Power Tools
Politech
PLoS
Posner & Becker Blog
Privacy & economics
Privacy Journal
Privacy Policy
Walt Mossberg
Phil Agre
Public Knowledge
Quicklinks
Reason
Red Herring
Reporting Civil Rights
RIP archive at FIPR
Roger Clarke
Ross Anderson
Rufus Pollock
Salon
Samuelson's cyberlinks
SANS Computer Security
Sarah Carter's lawlinks
ScadPlus Activities of the EU
SCOTUS blog
Scripting News
Shifted Librarian
Shirky
Siva Vaidhyanathan
Siva Vaidhyanathan Googlization
TalkLeft
Village Voice
Volokh Conspiracy
SciDev Network
Security Focus
Seltzer blog
Seth Finkelstein
Shifted Librarian
Silicon Valley
Slashdot
Slate
Snopes Urban legends
Spyblog
Stephen Fry
STLR
Susan Crawford
American Prospect Weblog
Tech Law Journal
The CATO Institute
The Blog of Doom
The Corner House
The Green Bag
The Guardian
The Industry Standard
The Nando Times
The New Republic TNR
The Register
The Times
The RISKS Digest
The Trademark Blog
Tony H
Townhall
UCLA Cyberspace Law
UEA law blog
UK Court Service
UK Criminal Justice blog
UK FOI blog
UK Human Rights Archive
UNESCO copyright site
Urban Legends
USACM blog
VUNet
Weatherall's law
Wikipedia
WIPO
WIPO CLEA
WJIN
xkcd
ZDNet


 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Sitemeter count:

One click on a button helps feed the hungry



      Monday, July 28, 2008

 
The House of Lords decision in an important case is due on Wednesday this week. The result of the Serious Fraud Office's appeal against the High Court judgement that they acted illegally in stopping the BAe-Saudi corruption inquiry will finally be settled. The Corner House says:

"Serious Fraud Office APPEAL to House of Lords

**Judgments to be handed down this Wednesday, 30 July 2008**

Back in April this year, the UK High Court ruled that the Director of the
Serious Fraud Office, acting on government advice, acted unlawfully when
he stopped its BAE-Saudi corruption investigation in December 2006.

The ruling followed the judicial review of the Director's decision sought
by The Corner House and Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT).

The Serious Fraud Office appealed against this ruling to the House of
Lords, the UK's highest court, on two principles of law:

* the Rule of Law;
* compliance with the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

The appeal was heard three weeks ago on 7-8 July.

Below is a summary of the main arguments put forward by the Serious Fraud
Office as to why the High Court's ruling should be overturned, and
responses from our lawyers as to why it should be upheld.

The relevant legal documents have all been posted on The Corner House
website: http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/subject/corruption/

(Send us an email if you would like a more detailed account of the appeal
hearing: enquiries AT thecornerhouse.org.uk)

We've just learnt that the judgments on the appeal from the five law lords
will be handed down this week, on Wednesday 30 July in the morning. We'll
let you know what they are as soon as we can.

Many thanks for all your messages of support; they are much appreciated.

best wishes from all at The Corner House

SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE APPEAL to House of Lords

On 7th-8th July 2008, the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords heard the appeal by the Director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) against the High Court ruling on 10 April 2008 that the SFO acted unlawfully in December 2006 when it terminated its investigation into alleged corruption by BAE Systems in recent arms deals with Saudi Arabia.

The ruling was a result of a judicial review brought by The Corner House and Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) that was held on 14th-15th February 2008 at the High Court before Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan.

CAAT and The Corner House lawyers maintained that the Serious Fraud Office Director's appeal should be dismissed because his decision to stop the SFO investigation breached the constitutional principle of the rule of law in allowing threats/blackmail to influence his decision, and breached Article 5 of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention (click Here to read our printed case).

Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) submitted a second witness statement updating the Lords on the continuing US and Swiss official investigations into alleged corruption in the BAE-Saudi arms deals.

JUSTICE, the independent human rights and law reform organisation that is the British section of the International Commission of Jurists, intervened in the Appeal in writing to address the domestic legal principles by which the legality of a prosecutor's decision to halt a criminal investigation in response to a threat should be assessed, and the relevant international obligations at issue, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

As part of its appeal, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office submitted three new witness statements from:

  1. Dr John Jenkins, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
  2. Helen Garlick, Assistant Director of the Serious Fraud Office (2nd witness statement)
  3. Robert Wardle, (now former) Director of the Serious Fraud Office

The two-day hearing was before an Appellate Committee of five law lords:

  • Lord Bingham of Cornhill
  • Lord Hoffman
  • Lord Rodger of Earlsferry
  • Baroness Hale of Richmond, and
  • Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood

The Appellate Committee will "report to the House [of Lords] in due course.""